Huge Study Of Diet Indicts Fat And Meat

By JANE E. BRODY
Published: May 08, 1990

EARLY findings from the most comprehensive large study ever undertaken of the relationship between diet and the risk of developing disease are challenging much of American dietary dogma. The study, being conducted in China, paints a bold portrait of a plant-based eating plan that is more likely to promote health than disease.

The study can be considered the Grand Prix of epidemiology. Sixty-five hundred Chinese have each contributed 367 facts about their eating and other habits that could ultimately help them and Americans preserve their health and prolong their lives. The data alone fill a volume of 920 pages, to be published next month by Cornell University Press. Among the first tantalizing findings are these: Obesity is related more to what people eat than how much. Adjusted for height, the Chinese consume 20 percent more calories than Americans do, but Americans are 25 percent fatter. The main dietary differences are fat and starch. The Chinese eat only a third the amount of fat Americans do, while eating twice the starch. The body readily stores fat but expends a larger proportion of the carbohydrates consumed as heat. Some of the differences may be attributable to exercise. The varying levels of physical activity among the Chinese were measured, but the data have not yet been analyzed.

Reducing dietary fat to less than 30 percent of calories, as is currently recommended for Americans, may not be enough to curb the risk of heart disease and cancer. To make a significant impact, the Chinese data imply, a maximum of 20 percent of calories from fat – and preferably only 10 to 15 percent – should be consumed.

Eating a lot of protein, especially animal protein, is also linked to chronic disease. Americans consume a third more protein than the Chinese do, and 70 percent of American protein comes from animals, while only 7 percent of Chinese protein does. Those Chinese who eat the most protein, and especially the most animal protein, also have the highest rates of the ”diseases of affluence” like heart disease, cancer and diabetes.

A rich diet that promotes rapid growth early in life may increase a woman’s risk of developing cancer of the reproductive organs and the breast. Childhood diets high in calories, protein, calcium and fat promote growth and early menarche, which in turn is associated with high cancer rates. Chinese women, who rarely suffer these cancers, start menstruating three to six years later than Americans. Dairy calcium is not needed to prevent osteoporosis. Most Chinese consume no dairy products and instead get all their calcium from vegetables. While the Chinese consume only half the calcium Americans do, osteoporosis is uncommon in China despite an average life expectancy of about 70 years, just five few years less than the American average.

These findings are only the beginning. Dr. T. Colin Campbell, a nutritional biochemist from Cornell University and the American mastermind of the Chinese diet study, predicts that this ”living laboratory” will continue to generate vital findings for the next 40 to 50 years.

The study, started in 1983 to explore dietary causes of cancer, has been expanded to include heart, metabolic and infectious diseases. Dr. Chen Junshi of the Chinese Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene organized the survey to cover locations from the semitropical south to the cold, arid north.

Exacting, Labor-Intensive Study

The extensive volume of raw data and its counterpart on computer tape will be available to any scientist to use as raw material for medical research.

It is an exacting, labor-intensive study, initially financed by the National Cancer Institute, that probably could not have been done anywhere except China. For nowhere else can accurate mortality statistics be combined with data from people who live the same way in the same place and eat the same foods for virtually their entire lives.

Nowhere else is there a genetically similar population with such great regional differences in disease rates, dietary habits and environmental exposures. For example, cancer rates can vary by a factor of several hundred from one region of China to another. These large regional variations in China highlight biologically important relationships between diet and disease.

And nowhere else could researchers afford to hire hundreds of trained workers to collect blood and urine samples and spend three days in each household gathering exact information on what and how much people eat, then analyzing the food samples for nutrient content.

‘The Whole Diet Panoply’

”The total cost in U.S. dollars of this project – $2.3 million plus 600 person-years of labor contributed by the Chinese Government – is a mere fraction of what it would have cost to do the same study here,” Dr. Campbell noted. And unlike typically circumscribed American studies that examine one characteristic as a factor in one disease, the Chinese investigation ”covers the whole diet panoply as it relates to all diseases.”

Dr. Mark Hegsted, emeritus professor of nutrition at Harvard University and former administrator of human nutrition for the United States Department of Agriculture, said: ”This is a very, very important study – unique and well done. Even if you could pay for it, you couldn’t do this study in the United States because the population is too homogeneous. You get a lot more meaningful data when the differences in diet and disease are as great as they are in the various parts of China.”

In the first part of the study, 100 people from each of 65 counties throughout China each contributed 367 items of information about their diets, lives and bodies. The responses from residents of each county were then pooled to derive countywide characteristics that could be measured against the area’s death rates for more than four dozen diseases.

By matching characteristics, researchers derived 135,000 correlations, about 8,000 of which are expected to have both statistical and biological significance that could shed light on the cause of some devastating disease.

In the poorer parts of China, infectious diseases remain the leading causes of death, but in the more affluent regions, heart disease, diabetes and cancer are most prominent, Dr. Campbell said.

Adding Taiwan to the Research

Although from an overall perspective of nutrient composition the Chinese diet is more health-promoting than ours, he said, there are some important limitations that result from a lack of economic development.

”Food quality and variety are not as good as ours,” he explained. ”With limited refrigeration, bacteria and mold contamination is more common, large amounts of salt and nitrites are used to preserve foods and hot spices are used to mask off-flavors.”

The study is now being expanded and revised. New mortality rates are being gathered to update the original mortality data from the early 1970’s and to reflect causes of death for 100 million people in the late 1980’s. The original 6,500 participants are being resurveyed and people from 12 counties in Taiwan are being included in the expanded survey, which will also measure many socioeconomic characteristics.

”We want to see how economics change and health factors follow,” Dr. Campbell explained in an interview. ”Taiwan should be interesting because it is intermediate between the United States and China in nutrient intake and plasma cholesterol levels. And since the Taiwanese gene pool is more like the Chinese, we can study the relative contributions of genetics and diet to risk of disease.”

Cholesterol as Disease Predictor

Dr. Campbell continued: ”So far we’ve seen that plasma cholesterol is a good predictor of the kinds of diseases people are going to get. Those with higher cholesterol levels are prone to the diseases of affluence – cancer, heart disease and diabetes.”

Contrary to earlier reports that linked low blood cholesterol levels to colon cancer, the Chinese study strongly suggests that low cholesterol not only protects against heart disease but also protects against cancer of the colon, the most common life-threatening cancer among Americans. In China, mortality rates from colon cancer are lowest where cholesterol levels are lowest.

Over all, cholesterol levels in China, which range from 88 to 165 milligrams per 100 milliliters of blood plasma, much lower than those in the United States, which range from 155 to 274 milligrams per 100 milliliters of plasma.

”Their high cholesterol is our low,” Dr. Campbell noted. He said the data strongly suggest that a major influence on cholesterol levels and disease rates is the high consumption of animal foods, including dairy products, by Americans.

‘Basically a Vegetarian Species’

”We’re basically a vegetarian species and should be eating a wide variety of plant foods and minimizing our intake of animal foods,” he said.

The Chinese have already begun to capitalize on these findings, using them to develop national food and agricultural policies that will promote health.

”Usually, the first thing a country does in the course of economic development is to introduce a lot of livestock,” Dr. Campbell said. ”Our data are showing that this is not a very smart move, and the Chinese are listening. They’re realizing that animal-based agriculture is not the way to go.”

The plant-rich Chinese diet contains three times more dietary fiber than Americans typically consume. The average intake in China is 33 grams of fiber a day, and it ranges as high as 77 grams in some regions. Dr. Campbell found no evidence to suggest that diets very high in fiber are in any way deleterious to nutritional well-being.

While American scientists worry that fiber may interfere with the absorption of essential minerals like iron, no reason for concern was found among the Chinese. Rather, those with the highest fiber intake also had the most iron-rich blood.

Iron From Vegetables

The study also showed that consumption of meat is not needed to prevent iron-deficiency anemia. The average Chinese adult, who shows no evidence of anemia, consumes twice the iron Americans do, but the vast majority of it comes from the iron in plants.

Nor are animal products needed to prevent osteoporosis, the study showed. ”Ironically,” Dr. Campbell noted, ”osteoporosis tends to occur in countries where calcium intake is highest and most of it comes from protein-rich dairy products. The Chinese data indicate that people need less calcium than we think and can get adequate amounts from vegetables.”

Another common health concern that could prove to be a red herring is the fear that aflatoxin, which is produced by a mold that grows on peanuts, corn and other grains, causes liver cancer. Rather, the Chinese study strongly indicates that chronic infection with hepatitis B virus and high serum cholesterol levels are the primary culprits.

”We did not find any relationship between aflatoxin and liver cancer, and we have the largest study on this question ever done,” Dr. Campbell said.

Among other intriguing findings are a relationship between infection with herpes simplex virus and coronary heart disease and a relationship between infection with the yeast candida and nasopharyngeal cancer.

”Lots and lots such relationships are turning up as we plot out the 367 characteristics on maps of China and try to match them up with maps of disease rates,” Dr. Campbell said. ”The data now need to be interpreted, and six Chinese scientists are working with us on this. The amount of information gathered in this study is kind of staggering,” he said, then proceeded to outline his interest in gathering more.

Largest Study Ever

The largest prospective nutrition study ever published suggests animal fat may play a role in the development of pancreatic cancer.

October 5, 2010 | 

The Spreadable Treat That May Cut Breast Cancer Risk

by: Rachael Anderson

The Spreadable Treat That May Cut Breast Cancer Risk

Think PB&J is just a boring lunchbox staple? Here’s something exciting: It may actually help stave off breast cancer.
A recent study found that eating peanut butter regularly as a girl appears to decrease the risk of developing benign breast disease, a known risk factor for breast cancer, as an adult.
For the study, the researchers collected diet questionnaires from more than 9,000 girls who were between the ages of 9 and 15. Then the researchers followed the girls for the next 14 years. At the end of the study, the young women who ate peanut butter or nuts two days a week as girls were 39% less likely to have benign breast disease. Girls who ate a daily serving of a food containing vegetable protein and fat — most commonly peanut butter, peanuts, other nuts, beans or corn – had a 68% lower risk. The foods were linked to a lower risk of benign breast disease even in girls with a family history of breast cancer. The researchers can’t yet explain the connection, and they note that the study doesn’t prove a cause-and-effect relationship.
What Is Benign Breast Disease?
Benign breast disease is a common condition marked by non-cancerous changes in breast tissue, including things like irregular lumps, cysts or masses. The changes may be related to fluctuating hormone levels over the menstrual cycle and at other phases of a woman’s life, including pregnancy and menopause. About one in four women will have some type of benign breast disease before menopause. While the great majority of benign breast conditions don’t lead to breast cancer, certain types can.

Diabetes Drugs

BREAKING MEDICAL NEWS June 11, 2013

 

More Risks Shown for Diabetes Drugs

June 11, 2013 

Commonly prescribed diabetes medications have been linked to risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, according to recent publications. The drugs include exenatide (Byetta), liraglutide (Victoza), sitagliptin (Januvia), and possibly other similar medications. Reports from Dr. Peter Butler of UCLA and Drs. Sonal Singh and Jodi Segal of Johns Hopkins University describe these adverse effects in the journals Gastroenterolgy,JAMA Internal Medicine, and Diabetes. These new warnings about adverse effects of oral diabetes medications follow in the wake of the FDA pulling blockbuster medications troglitazone (Rezulin) off the market, restricting use of rosiglitazone (Avandia), and issuing warnings related to bladder cancer to pioglitazone (Actos).

Prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes with nutritional measures, especially a plant-based diet and avoidance of meat and dairy products, remains a safe and effective approach.

Elashoff M, Matveyenk AV, Gier B, Elashoff R, Butler PC. Pancreatitis, pancreatic, and thyroid cancer with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies.Gastroenterology. 2011;141:150-156.

Butler AE, Campbell-Thompson M, Gurlo T, Dawson DW, Atkinson M, Butler PC. Marked expansion of exocrine and endocrine pancreas with incretin therapy in humans with increased exocrine pancreas dysplasia and the potential for glucagon-producing neuroendocrine tumors. Diabetes. Published ahead of print March 22, 2013.

Singh S, Chang HY, Richards TM, Weiner JP, Clark JM, Segal JB. Glucagon like peptide 1-based therapies and risk of hospitalization for acute pancreatitis in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based matched case-control study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:534-539.

Subscribe to PCRM’s Breaking Medical News.

Breaking Medical News is a service of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 5100 Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 400, Washington, DC 20016, 202-686-2210. Join PCRM and receive the quarterly magazine,Good Medicine.

Fats: The Good the Bad and the Ugly

Health Canada

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca

Health Canada- states, unsaturated fats (plant-based) are good and saturated (animal-based) are bad.

The good: unsaturated fats

Unsaturated fat is a type of fat found in the foods you eat. Replacing saturated and trans fats with unsaturated fats has been shown to help lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of heart disease. Unsaturated fat also provides omega-3 and -6 fatty acids. Choose foods with unsaturated fat as part of a balanced diet using Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide.

Even though it is a “good fat,” having too much unsaturated fat may lead to having too many calories. This may cause weight gain and increase your risk of developing obesitytype 2 diabetesheart disease and certain types of Next link will take you to another Web site cancer.

There are two main types of unsaturated fats:

  1. monounsaturated fat, which can be found in:
    • avocados
    • nuts and seeds (like cashews, pecans, almonds and peanuts)
    • vegetable oils (like canola, olive, peanut, safflower, sesame and sunflower)
  2. polyunsaturated fat, which can be found in:
    • fatty fish (like herring, mackerel, salmon, trout and smelt)
    • fish oils
    • nuts and seeds (like cashews, pecans, almonds and peanuts)
    • vegetable oils (like canola, corn, flaxseed, soybean and sunflower)

The bad: saturated fats

Saturated fat is a type of fat found in food. It has been shown to raiseLDL or “bad” cholesterol levels. Having high LDL-cholesterol levels increases your risk for heart disease.

Saturated fat is found in many foods:

  • animal foods (like beef, chicken, lamb, pork and veal)
  • coconut, palm and palm kernel oils
  • dairy products (like butter, cheese and whole milk)
  • lard
  • shortening

Choosing lower-fat meat and dairy products can help reduce the amount of saturated fat in your diet.

Use vegetable oil or soft margarines that are low in saturated and trans fats instead of butter, hard margarine, lard and shortening.

The ugly: trans fats

Trans fat is made from a chemical process known as “partial hydrogenation.” This is when liquid oil is made into a solid fat.

Like saturated fat, trans fat has been shown to raise LDL or “bad” cholesterol levels, which increases your risk for heart disease. Unlike saturated fat, trans fat also lowers HDL or “good” cholesterol. A low level of HDL-cholesterol is also a risk factor for heart disease.

Until recently, most of the trans fat found in a typical Canadian diet came from:

  • margarines (especially hard margarines)
  • commercially fried foods
  • bakery products made with shortening, margarine or oils containing partially hydrogenated oils and fats (including cakes, cookies, crackers, croissants, doughnuts, fried and breaded foods, muffins, pastries and other snack foods)

If a product has less than 0.2 grams of trans fat AND less than 0.5 g of saturated fat, the food manufacturer can say that the product is trans-fat-free. Learn more about nutrition claims.

Our food supply is rapidly changing and the trans fat content of many of these products has now been reduced. But it is still important to look at the Nutrition Facts table to make sure the food product you are buying has only a little or no trans fat.

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/iyh-vsv/med/fats-gras-eng.php

Cancer Society says “Red meat and processed meat increase your risk of cancer”

Nutrition and fitness

People exercising on matsWe wish we could tell you that preventing cancer was as simple as eating a certain food or doing a certain exercise, but we can’t. This much, though, is clear:

 

  • You have a higher risk of developing cancer if you are overweight. Staying at a healthy body weight reduces your risk of cancer.
  • Eating well – lots of veggies and fruit, lots of fibre, and little fat and sugar – will help you keep a healthy body weight.
  • Regular physical activity helps protect against cancer. It’s also one of the best ways to help you stay at a healthy body weight, which reduces your risk of cancer.
  • Red meat and processed meat increase your risk of cancer.

Food for thought

About one-third of all cancers can be prevented by eating well, being active and maintaining a healthy body weight.

 

The science is clear: it’s the overall pattern of living that’s important. You can lower your risk if you move more, stay lean and eat plenty of vegetables and fruit, as well as other plant foods such as whole grains and beans.

Read more:http://www.cancer.ca/en/prevention-and-screening/live-well/nutrition-and-fitness/?region=pe

Fatty Diets Linked to Cancer and Early Death

 

Breaking Medical News
FaceBook_icon_16 Twitter Email

Fatty Diets Linked to Cancer and Early Death

li_fried

Diets high in saturated fats and sugar may increase your risk of death from gastrointestinal cancers, including stomach and esophageal, according to a presentation at the American Institute for Cancer Research Annual Research Conference. Researchers observed 10,525 men and women from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study for 16 years and asked them to keep diet records. Participants with diets higher in fat and sugar were four times more likely to develop and 53 percent more likely to die from these cancer, compared with those who consumed plant-based diets.

Tabung FK, Steck SE, Zhang J. Dietary inflammatory index and risk of mortality: findings from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Poster presented at: American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) Annual Research Conference; November 7, 2013: Bethesda, MD.

What’s Wrong with Eggs?

By    |   Posted on September 3, 2013 

 

Whats wrong with eggs 570x299 What’s Wrong with Eggs?A common question I hear as a dietitian (second only to “Where do you get your protein?” of course) is “What’s wrong with eggs?”

Where to begin? Let’s start with the obvious egg facts. Eggs have zero dietary fiber, and about 70 percent of their calories are from fat—a big portion of which is saturated. They are also loaded with cholesterol—about 213 milligrams for an average-sized egg. For reference, people with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or high cholesterol should consume fewer than 200 milligrams of cholesterol each day. (Uh oh.) And, humans have no biological need to consume any cholesterol at all; we make more than enough in our own bodies.

 

Why so much fat and cholesterol in such a tiny package? Think about it: eggs hold every piece of the puzzle needed to produce a new life. Within that shell lies the capacity to make feathers, eyes, a beak, a brain, a heart, and so on. It takes a lot of stuff to make such a complex being.

In addition to these excessive (for humans) natural components of an egg, other human-health hazards exist. Because eggshells are fragile and porous, and conditions on egg farms are crowded, eggs are the perfect host for salmonella—the leading cause of food poisoning in the U.S.

Those are some facts and figures. But how do eggs affect real people in real life? Luckily, researchers have conducted good studies to help answer that question.

Cancer

In a 1992 analysis of dietary habits, people who consumed just 1.5 eggs per week had nearly five times the risk for colon cancer, compared with those who consumed hardly any (fewer than 11 per year), according to the International Journal of Cancer. The World Health Organization analyzed data from 34 countries in 2003 and found that eating eggs is associated with death from colon and rectal cancers. And a 2011 study funded by the National Institutes of Healthshowed that eating eggs is linked to developing prostate cancer. By consuming 2.5 eggs per week, men increased their risk for a deadly form of prostate cancer by 81 percent, compared with men who consumed less than half an egg per week. Finally, even moderate egg consumption tripled the risk of developing bladder cancer, according to a 2005 study published in International Urology and Nephrology.

Diabetes

A review of fourteen studies published earlier this year in the journalAtherosclerosis showed that people who consumed the most eggs increased their risk for diabetes by 68 percent, compared with those who ate the fewest.

In a 2008 publication for the Physicians’ Health Study I, which included more than 21,000 participants, researchers found that those who consumed seven or more eggs per week had an almost 25 percent increased risk of death compared to those with the lowest egg consumption. The risk of death for participants with diabetes who ate seven or more eggs per week was twice as high as for those who consumed the least amount of eggs.

Egg consumption also increases the risk of gestational diabetes, according to two 2011 studies referenced in the American Journal of Epidemiology. Women who consumed the most eggs had a 77 percent increased risk of diabetes in one study and a 165 percent increased risk in the other, compared with those who consumed the least.

Heart Disease

Researchers published a blanket warning in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology, informing readers that ceasing egg consumption after a heart attack would be “a necessary act, but late.” In the previously mentioned 14-study review, researchers found that people who consumed the most eggs increased their risk for cardiovascular disease by 19 percent, and if those people already had diabetes, the risk for developing heart disease jumped to 83 percent with increased egg consumption.

New research published this year has shown that a byproduct of choline, a component that is particularly high in eggs, increases one’s risk for a heart attack, stroke, and death.

Animal Protein

Inevitably, this discussion also leads to another question: “Even egg whites?” Yes, even egg whites are trouble. The reason most people purport to eat egg whites is also the reason they should be wary — egg whites are a very concentrated source of animal protein (remember, the raw material for all those yet-to-be-developed body parts?). Because most Westerners get far more protein than they need, adding a concentrated source of it to the diet can increase the risk for kidney disease, kidney stones, and some types of cancer.

By avoiding eggs and consuming more plant-based foods, you will not only decrease your intake of cholesterol, saturated fat, and animal protein, but also increase your intake of protective fiber, antioxidants, and phytochemicals. Be smart! Skip the eggs and enjoy better health!

Susan Levin, M.S., R.D.

Susan Levin, M.S., R.D.

Susan Levin, M.S., R.D., is director of nutrition education at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting preventive medicine. Ms. Levin researches and writes about the connection between plant-based diets and a reduced risk of chronic diseases, including cancer, diabetes, and heart disease.

Are You Chicken to Learn About Chicken?

Are You Chicken to Learn About Chicken?

 

The Unhealthy White Meat and Eggs

Consumption of chicken has increased dramatically in the last twenty years and the average North American eats over fifty pounds of chicken each year, which is twice the amount that was consumed twenty years ago. Most people see chicken as a really “healthy” alternative to beef, and as a low-fat and wholesome part of their diet. If you add the fact that chicken is cheap, versatile and fast, the unassuming bird seems to be the ideal entree. Meanwhile, the bird that is held in such high regard in our diets is responsible for over 1000 deaths and between 7 to 80 million illnesses each year in the US alone… not including the long running diseases caused by a broken down immune system over time, acidity, blood platlets sticking together to form clots, and plaque build-up.[i]

 
From organic free range farms and regular factory farms, chicken is far from wholesome.Time magazine has called chicken one of the most dangerous items in the American home. Recent reports tell us that over 30 percent of U.S. chicken is contaminated with salmonella, and 62 percent is contaminated with campylobacter. These two pathogens cause 80 percent of the illnesses and 75 percent of the deaths associated with meat consumption, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The chickens we eat are overweight, overgrown, and unhealthy. Yet people happily throw buffalo wings, chicken breasts, drumsticks, and frozen dinners into their shopping carts, blind to the realities of eating the popular bird.

Organic Animal Products: Somehow people have become duped that a label stating “organic” means “healthy,” and that all other issues with eating chicken go away with this word. Many continue to justify eating chicken by adding the word organic. Organic is better for the animal, but any animal product inside of you, no matter how free range and organic it may be, is not healthy from the studies listed below. A few less toxins might be found in the meat if it is organic. But is organic acidity better for you? What about organic cholesterol, organic parasites, and organic plaque in your organs? Whether it is organic or not, chicken still takes a toll on your body to digest. It is not a nutrient dense food, it lowers your immune system, and it causes cancer cells to grow. Organic casein protein from dairy still makes you acidic, depleting calcium from your bones, and it still causes cancer. Be careful of new marketing spins, words, and techniques.

 

Is Chicken a Healthy Alternative to Beef?

Fears of cholesterol and high amounts of fat have caused more people to consume chicken more than ever before. People began eating more chicken and less red meat, believing that chicken was a healthier and smarter choice. Unknowing consumers will be surprised to learn that chicken is not a low-fat food. Even light, skinless chicken derives almost 18 percent of its calories from fat, and skinless, roasted, dark chicken is 32 percent fat! Reports show that the cholesterol content of chicken can be comparable to beef at 25 milligrams per ounce. Is this a lower-fat alternative? Depending on which cut of beef one compares to chicken it’s possible, but chicken is definitely not a low-fat food! Food marketing is big business and no different with chicken. They teach that it’s low in fat, low in cholesterol, and healthier than beef. Is this true? Not by a long shot.

 

 

 
HEALTHIER?

Information is available contradicting the myths that chicken and turkey contain less cholesterol and that; reportedly, they represent a good option for those on a healthier diet. According to studies by Dean Ornish, M.D., from a five-year follow-up of patients on his popular vegetarian plan for reversing heart disease, compared with patients on the chicken and fish diet recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA), the majority following the AHA guidelines became progressively worse, while those who made intensive changes grew progressively better. So there goes the healthy option myth! Plant foods contain no cholesterol but all animal products always do. Animal products also contain no fiber. For every one percent increase in cholesterol levels, the risk of heart attack rises by two percent. For every 100 milligrams of cholesterol in the daily diet, the typical amount in a four-ounce serving of either beef or chicken, one’s cholesterol level typically zooms up five points. Unlike fat, cholesterol concentrates in the lean part of the meat. Many people seem to think the fat is the cholesterol mistakenly.

 
LOWER IN FAT?

An honest look at the nutritional value of chicken reveals that chicken meat is not low in fat and “not even close.” A 3.5-ounce piece of broiled lean steak is 56 percent fat as a percentage of calories, and chicken contains nearly the same at 51 percent (organic or not). Compare those amounts with the fat in a baked potato (one percent), steamed cauliflower (six percent), and baked beans (four percent), and any notions that chicken is a health food go out the window. Fancy packages can’t disguise the fact that chicken and all meats are muscles, and muscles are made of protein and fat. Also, the combination of fat, protein, and carcinogens found in cooked chicken creates troubling risks for colon cancer. Chicken not only gives you a load of fat you don’t want, its heterocyclic amines (HCAs) are potent carcinogens produced from creatine, amino acids, and sugars in poultry as well as other meats during cooking. These same chemicals are found in tobacco smoke and are 15 times more concentrated in grilled chicken than in beef. HCAs may be one of the reasons that meat-eaters have much higher colon cancer rates, at about 300 percent higher when compared to that of vegetarians.

Ian Coghill, Vice Chairman of the Environmental Health Office’s Food Safety Committee, says that chicken should carry a government health warning on the package, like cigarettes.

Consider this: Chickens may be fed the carcasses and byproducts of any other animals, including sheep (which may be infected with scrapie), cattle (which may be infected with BSE), and dead chickens (from disease) and chicken excrement.

 
CLEAN?

In 1991, the Atlanta Constitution did a special report on the poultry industry. Of 84 federal poultry inspectors interviewed, 81 said that thousands of birds tainted or stained with feces—which a decade ago would have been condemned—are now rinsed and sold daily. Seventy-five of the inspectors said that thousands of diseased birds pass from processing lines to stores every day. Poultry plants often salvage meat, cutting away visibly diseased or contaminated sections and selling the rest as packaged wings, legs, or breasts, according to 70 inspectors. Richard Simmons, inspector at a ConAgra plant, said, “Practically every bird now, no matter how bad, is salvaged. This meat is not wholesome. I would not want to eat it. I would never, in my wildest dreams, buy cut-up parts at a store today.”
And just listen to USDA Inspector Ronnie Sarratt: “I’ve had birds that had yellow pus visibly coming out of their insides, and I was told to save the breast meat off them and even save the second joint of the wing. You might get those breasts today at a store in a package of breast fillets. And you might get the other in a pack of buffalo wings.” Previously, inspectors used to condemn all birds with air sacculitus, a disease that causes yellow fluids and mucus to break up into the lungs. In a 1989 article in Southern Exposure, USDA inspector Estes Philpott of Arkansas estimated that he was forced to approve 40 percent of air sac birds that would have been condemned 10 years ago.

 
CHICKEN CANCER

Tony Moore of Joice and Hill broiler breeders was quoted as saying that chicken cancer (Marek’s disease) is responsible for the excessively high losses of chickens and, despite chickens being vaccinated against it as day-old chicks, mortality is increasingly significant. A rapidly increasing threat exists from Gumboro disease, a viral cancer, and on top of this, avian leucosis a bird variety of leukemia now commonplace. In fact, one American report found that, “Virtually all commercial chickens are heavily infected with leucosis virus.” Nonetheless, because the tumors are not grossly apparent until about 20 weeks of age, the virus is not economically as important as is the Marek’s disease virus, which induces tumors by six-eight weeks of age.
“Can chicken cancer spread to humans?” you might ask. It is quite possible as studies do seem to prove that malignant tumors and other cancers can spread from one species to another. It has been proven that acidity causes cancer cells to grow, and all animal products are acidic.
In some ways, the connection is really very simple. First, we know that some “meat producing animals” (especially cows and chickens) suffer from tumors and cancers. Second, we know that cancer can be transmitted by virus from one animal to another and indeed from one species to another. Third, cancerous and tumorous meats are not necessarily removed at the slaughterhouse and may quite easily find their way to the butcher’s shop. The inevitable conclusion drawn from all this is that if you eat meat, sooner or later you are likely to eat part of an animal that either has cancer or has been exposed to a virus that can cause cancer. It is difficult however to quantify the risk you would be running by eating tumorous meat because cancers can take many years to surface into readable size.

 
SALMONELLA, CAMPYLOBACTER

In food processing plants where workers process red meat as well as chicken, the chicken preparation areas are often cordoned off from the rest of the plant. The work there is carried out behind glass screens in a kind of quarantine, just in case bugs that thrive on and in chickens infect everything else. One of the most widespread of these bugs is salmonella. Almost every process of chicken production helps to spread bugs from one chicken to another until they finish inside the plastic wrappers. There is a danger when touching raw chicken that people can spread the infection elsewhere.
According to an article by Murry Cohen, M.D. and Allison Lee Solin of the PCRM, campylobacter, the most common cause of diarrhea in the United States, can sometimes lead to a paralysis-inducing disease called Gullain-Barré Syndrome, and salmonella, which causes severe food poisoning, can be fatal. They state that, according to 1997 tests conducted by the Minnesota Health Department, 79 percent of chickens sampled from supermarkets were infected with campylobacter, and 20 percent of those were infected with an antibiotic-resistant strain. About 58 percent of turkeys were infected, and 84 percent of those carried a resistant strain. With the introduction of quinolones for use in poultry, resistant strains of campylobacter are now appearing in the U.S., explains Stuart Levy, M.D., a physician with the Tufts School of Medicine. He described the antibiotic-resistance trend as an international public health nightmare.
In February 1999, the British medical journal The Lancet reported that scientists had discovered antibiotic-resistant bacteria in feed being given to chickens in the United States.
Kieswer of the PCRM argues that with live salmonella bacteria growing inside one in every three packages of chicken, chicken meat is making many people sick. Although deaths from salmonella poisonings sometimes make the evening news, millions more cases that cause flu-like symptoms go undetected and uncounted. Salmonella poisoning can cause vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and low-grade fever, lasting for several days. When it spreads to the blood and other organs, it can be fatal and is for as many as 9,000 people every year. Also, campylobacter infects as many as two-thirds of all pre-packaged chicken. Salmonella and campylobacter have become increasingly common because modern factory farms crowd thousands of chickens into tightly confined spaces, where excrement and other forms of bacteria spread contaminants. As we have learned, chicken has the same amount of cholesterol as beef; four ounces of beef and four ounces of chicken both contain about 100 milligrams of cholesterol and the cholesterol from chicken similarly clogs arteries and causes heart disease. The human body produces cholesterol on its own and never needs outside sources. Each added dose contributes to artery blockages, which lead to heart attacks, strokes, and other serious health problems.
According to Dr Barnard of the PCRM, chicken (no matter if it is organic or not) looks harmless, but fancy marketing campaigns cannot disguise its shortcomings. Chicken may be lighter in color than beef, but your body cannot tell the difference. Chicken, like other animal products, contains hefty doses of cholesterol, fat, and animal protein. It leaves your body wanting fiber, vitamin C, and complex carbohydrates. When heated, chicken produces dangerous heterocyclic amines (HCAs) as creatine, amino acids, and sugar in chicken muscles interacts. HCAs—the same carcinogens found in tobacco smoke—are 15 times more concentrated in grilled chicken than in beef. The fat, animal protein, and carcinogens in cooked chicken creates risks for colon cancer. Moreover, poultry, like all meat, lacks any fiber to help cleanse the digestive tract of excess hormones and cholesterol.
In addition, you wouldn’t dream of consuming veterinary medicines, but in choosing chicken, you’re doing just that. Today’s farms increasingly operate much like factories. Unlike PCBs, which are slow to leave our bodies, chemicals from medicated feed and various veterinary compounds are eliminated when we stop eating meat. In comparison with the general population, vegetarian women have 98-99 percent lower levels of several pesticides as well as many other chemicals ingested by eating animal products.

 
LISTERIOSIS

In the U.S., in one of their biggest-ever meat recalls, agribusiness giant Cargill called back almost 17 million pounds of “ready-to-eat” turkey and chicken products. These meats were processed at Cargill’s Waco, Texas, plant between May and mid-December. The fear was possible contamination by the often-deadly bacteria listeria monocytogenes. Dr. Barnard, of the PCRM, argues that this development added an exclamation point to the end of 2000, a year already beset by a record-setting pace of more than 70 U.S. meat recalls.
According to Dr. Barnard, the latest problem, listeria, may not be the household name that salmonella is, or that E coli and campylobacter are fast becoming, but it’s depressingly familiar to emergency room personnel, who routinely see the human costs of food borne illnesses. With listeria, symptoms can often entail high fevers, severe headaches, neck stiffness, and nausea. Such symptoms can persist for days, even weeks. Listeria can also trigger miscarriages and stillbirths. Even with treatment, listeria kills fully one-fifth of those contracting it. Untreated, it kills 70 percent. Listeria strikes hardest at those with weakened or overtaxed immune systems, notably the elderly, the frail, pregnant women, newborn infants, diabetics, AIDS patients, cancer radiation and chemotherapy patients, and organ transplant recipients.
In fact, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported in 1989 that listeriosis exacts dire consequences. Infections in adults younger than 40 years proved fatal 11 percent of the time. In adults older than 60, the death rate was 63 percent. Women infected late in their pregnancies can pass the disease to their fetuses, later giving birth to children with infections of the central nervous system.
Scientists detected listeria in up to 70 percent of uncooked poultry and meat samples they collected from seven countries, according to studies published in the Journal of Food Proteinin 1989 and 1993. Those pieces snugly fit into the more general pattern. In instance after instance, food borne illness investigations show the culprit to have been either an animal product or contamination of food or water by feces from animal agriculture.
As long as meat is the center of our diets, food borne illness will remain a fact of life. As matters stand, estimates put U.S. food borne illness cases at 76 million per year, including 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,200 deaths, 500 of those from listeriosis. Even if pathogens such as listeria could somehow be eliminated, digestive-tract cancers, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and other debilitating illnesses would still make eating a sliced turkey sandwich, chicken salad, or hot dogs akin to wandering through minefields. Fortunately, we can avoid those hazards. One of the most attractive features of bananas, carrots, oatmeal, and veggie burgers is that they have no intestines where virulent bacteria and worms can incubate. They contain no cholesterol and very little fat![ii]

 

EGGS
Eggs are the highest-ranking cholesterol product around. Eggs have 550 Milligrams of cholesterol per 100-gram portion.

Although, many consumers believe that labels such as free-range, free-roaming, or cage-free mean that these chickens spend their days in natural outdoor settings, the label means something entirely different to the egg industry. The nutritional value of egg whites is practically nothing. The whites have about half an egg’s protein content, yes, and almost all of its sodium. That’s pretty much it, barring trace amounts of other nutrients. Hens on commercial cage-free farms are not kept in cages, but they still have their sensitive beaks cut off with a hot blade and are crammed together in filthy sheds where they will live for years until their egg production wanes and they’re sent to slaughter. They never go outside, breathe fresh air, feel the sun on their backs, or do anything else that is natural or important to them. They suffer from the same lung lesions and ammonia burns as hens in cages, and they have breast blisters to add to their suffering.

  • Chickens’ eggs are the byproduct of a chicken’s “menstrual” cycle. If fertilized, they would produce baby chicks.
  • Male chicks are worthless to the egg industry, so every year millions of them are tossed into trash bags to suffocate or are thrown alive into high-speed grinders called “macerators.”
  • Egg-laying hens are all eventually slaughtered for their flesh. Their weak and emaciated bodies are made into soup or dog and cat food, or they are fed back to other chickens.
  • “Free-range” eggs are a marketing ploy—the free-range label is not subject to any USDA regulations, so “free-range” chickens endure miserable conditions, just as all animals used for food do.[iii]

 

We are told that stress helps creates disease, but what if we are eating the severe stress of another animal?

The typical, American breakfast is probably the worst meal choices we have. The typical breakfast in America, among other countries, consists of animal products, sugar, flour, or a combination thereof. Oatmeal, fruit, and some raw grain cereals are about the only healthy food that should be consumed at breakfast, if following traditional meal choices. Why not eat lunch or dinner items for breakfast that include more vegetables? Why do certain cereals lower cholesterol as the commercials say? They do so by substituting cereal for breakfast, instead of the other animal products you normally would consume. You could probably eat cardboard and have the same effect. Okay, that might be an exaggeration, but you get the point.

Do not let people like Rachael Ray fool you. Cooking shows are entertaining. Many chefs think the meals they are cooking are healthy if the animal products are lower in fat. Compared to what? Make no mistake, the words “animal product” and “healthy” do not go together. Animal products will keep you alive on an island with no other food options, but the reason you eat them is for the patterned craving developed. Whether organic or free range, animal products have cholesterol, they are acidic, extremely hard to digest, and they are not the ideal nutrition our bodies need.

Dairy Products Will Literally Kill You!

 -Roger Mason

Milk and dairy products are the number one allergenic food in the world. All adults of all races are allergic to milk and dairy because of the LACTOSE (milk sugar) and casein content. Children lose the ability to produce the enzyme lactase at about the age of three years old. Only humans drink milk after weaning. We choose cow milk, which is meant for calves and not people. Lactose does not just pass harmlessly through the body undigested, but causes a lot of problems – including CANCER. That’s right; people who drink milk and eat dairy products get more cancer of most kinds, especially prostate and breast cancer. They also get more heart disease, diabetes, and other conditions. Blacks, Amerindians, and Asians have the worst problems with milk and milk products.

A study was done for 11 years running of over 20,000 doctors. This was appropriately called the Physician’s Health Study. An article appeared in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (volume 74) specifically on prostate cancer and dairy consumption. The authors concluded, “These results support the hypothesis that dairy products… are associated with a greater risk of prostate cancer.” This applies equally to breast cancer, as prostate and breast cancer are almost the exact same diseases, with the same causes, and the same natural cures basically. “In conclusion, this report supports and extends previous observations that high intakes of dairy products…are associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer.” The doctors who ate little or no dairy had much less cancer than the ones who ate dairy regularly. The ones who ate lots of dairy had the highest of all rates by far.
How do you give up milk and dairy products? Very simply. All the major chain groceries now  carry a variety of non-dairy milks including soy, rice, almond, and oat milks. Keep trying these until you find one you like best. Soon you will prefer non-dairy milk very much, and will actually find cow milk somewhat distasteful. Use this for cooking, on cold cereal, and the usual ways you use dairy milk. There are a variety of soy and other cheeses that really melt and taste like dairy cheese in at least eight different flavors such as American, Jack, Cheddar, Mozzarella, Parmesan, Feta, etc. You can find soy sour cream, cream cheese, and other such substitutes. Soy yogurt and ice cream are full of sugar, and can only be used as occasional treats.
Prostate and breast cancer are major epidemics in America. There was another article in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (volume 75). This was based on the Health Professionals Follow-up Study for over 33,000 men. The men who ate the most protein got the most cancer. The men who ate the least protein got the least cancer. The animal protein found in red meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products promotes disease. Milk products contain the cancer promoting protein casein. Whole grains and beans have all the protein you need- without the fat and cholesterol. There is more proof the promoters of high protein diets are all nuts. We eat twice the protein we need. This also leads to dangerous high  uric acid levels. Campbell’s book The China Study proved that animal protein per se causes cancer and other diseases.

 

Other published international studies show repeatedly that intake of milk and dairy products leads to higher rates of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and mortality. The more dairy foods you eat the sooner you’ll die. Take dairy completely out of your life. Humans and animals were never meant to eat milk or milk products after weaning. Dairy is the worst allergenic food on earth. Go to websites like www.notmilk.com to learn more. Milk is poison.